There is an article circulating on Twitter. I'm sure it's selling ink for Forbes. It plays into the politics of providing additional government supports for higher-priced coal and nuclear. But it's based on faulty analysis.

There is no debate among industry participants. Wind and solar have had a significant impact on power markets (energy markets). Market-clearing prices in Europe, United Kingdom, the United States have declined. As more wind and solar resources are added, prices decline further. This phenomenon explains why independent power producers struggle for margin. It also explains why coal and nuclear plants are seeking additional government supports to stay in business. They will tell anyone willing to listen, coal and nuclear are not competitive without new subsidies (their initial capital costs were fully subsidized).

Here's the author's trickery. He completely ignores power market dynamics. He jumps to the end of the utility value chain, focuses on the final retail price of electricity, and falsely concludes the villains are wind and solar.

What the author doesn't tell readers is that electricity prices (not energy prices) are heavily regulated all over the world, including Europe and the United States. When deciding on the price of electricity, regulators include the market price of energy and add much more (state and local taxes, fees, reliability costs, infrastructure costs, bad debt, line maintenance, operations, management costs, union costs, pension costs, guaranteed utility margins, and so on). While energy prices have been declining, regulated costs have been increasing.

It turns out the villain is not the market; it's the regulators. The other villain is the publication of faulty analysis.


WordPress database error: [Table './dailyspeculations_com_@002d_dailywordpress/wp_comments' is marked as crashed and last (automatic?) repair failed]
SELECT * FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = '12096' AND comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date




Speak your mind


Resources & Links