MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail  |  Shopping  |  Money  |  People & Chat Sign in with your .NET Passport    
Money
  Home     Banking  |   Planning  |   Taxes  |   Money Plus     Help  
CNBC   Investing Home     Portfolio     Markets     Stocks     Funds     Brokers     CNBC TV  
 
MSN Money Insight
  Jubak's Journal
  SuperModels
  Start Investing
  Strategy Lab
  Company Focus
  Mutual Funds
 
  Special Reports
 
Other Views
  Contrarian Chronicles
  TheStreet.com
 
Resources
  Article Index
  Decision Centers
 
Related Links
  Market Dispatches
  Stock Picks
  Message Boards
Victor Niederhoffer and Laurel Kenner

Print-friendly version
Send this to a friend

Posted 8/14/2003

Cool Tools
The right tool for tracking stocks
Pay all your bills with a few clicks
Get a free copy of your credit report
Find It!
Article Index
Finance Q&A
Tools Index
Site map
MSN Money




Sponsored links

Practical Speculation
Purchase Niederhoffer and Kenner's new book Practical Speculation on Amazon.com











Related Articles


Does an elite college really pay?

Related Sites


Daily Speculations











The Speculator

Recent articles:
• Are you an investing predator -- or prey?, 8/7/2003
• Confidence pays off, if it's earned, 7/31/2003
• Readers offer proverbs to trade by, 7/24/2003
More...



The Speculator
Do Harvard-educated CEOs deliver?
advertisement
MSN Shopping
The Speculators find that companies run by graduates of Harvard and other Ivy League schools fare worse than those run by CEOs educated at rivals such as Stanford, MIT and the University of Chicago.

By Victor Niederhoffer and Laurel Kenner

And walking into the ring, the Crusher from Cambridge, the Ivy League Annihilator, the Brain Trust Blitzer, able to consume libraries at a bite and calculate second derivatives while stomping the strongest adversaries, from those hallowed halls of M&A, those white towers of knowledge, the brawny, the brainy … CHRIS NOWINSKI, putting the best of his coveted Harvard degree to use in the ring against opponents whose only education came in the school of hard knocks and who often weigh twice as much!

The success of Chris Nowinski in the trash-talking, slapstick-sweaty arena of World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE, news, msgs) inspired the Spec Duo to study the value of Harvard degrees in the corporate ring. In particular, do Nasdaq 100 ($IQX) companies with Harvard-educated CEOs show the kind of superior performance that Nowinski shows in his wrestling matches?
Money 2004.
Smarter, faster and easier
than ever.


It turns out that nine Nasdaq 100 companies have CEOs with Harvard backgrounds: eBay (EBAY, news, msgs), Human Genome Sciences (HGSI, news, msgs), IDEC Pharmaceuticals (IDPH, news, msgs), Introgen (INGN, news, msgs), Lamar Advertising (LAMR, news, msgs), Microsoft (MSFT, news, msgs), Staples (SPLS, news, msgs), Starbucks (SBUX, news, msgs) and Sun Microsystems (SUNW, news, msgs). (Editor's note: Microsoft owns MSN Money.)

At close to 10% of the Nasdaq 100 contingent, this is a much higher proportion than would be expected if the Harvard name were not a passport to the executive realm. After all, Harvard’s annual crop of 1,500 degrees amounts to just 0.1% of the total 1.5 million degrees awarded by U.S. colleges and universities each year. The nine Harvard-graduate CEOs amount to three times the total number of Nasdaq 100 CEOs from the University of Chicago, the next most popular school.

Aside from the University of Chicago’s three (who work at Brocade Communications Systems (BRCD, news, msgs), Gilead Sciences (GILD, news, msgs) and Oracle (ORCL, news, msgs)), the other Ivy League equivalents -- Stanford, Berkeley and MIT -- each have two CEOs among the Nasdaq 100 group. The two Berkeley CEO companies are Altera (ALTR, news, msgs) and QLogic (QLGC, news, msgs). The two MIT CEO companies are Chiron (CHIR, news, msgs) and Symantec (SYMC, news, msgs). We enumerate these companies in full because these nine Ivy-equivalent CEOs turn out to show by far the best performance of all the classes considered.

How elite, really?
In considering the Harvard CEO group, however, the Spec Duo started out with a certain trepidation. There is a proverb among businesspeople that the value of a Harvard degree increases with the square of the distance from Harvard. And many of our friends can recall selective anecdotes of many Harvard CEO-led companies that fell to the bottom.

These doubts are reinforced by the academic studies on this point. Stacy Berg Dale of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Alan B. Krueger of Princeton University consider whether a degree from a selective college has value in their paper, “Estimating the payoff to attending a more selective college: An application of selection on observables and unobservables.” They conclude that those who go to selected colleges earn no more than those who go to less selective schools.

The reason is apparently that those who get into the selective schools would tend to earn more regardless of where they went to college. If for some reason they go to a good state school, they are likely to perform quite well there. This leads to comparable earnings to the Harvard contingent.

Moreover, there is an entire school of thought in the literature that leadership is irrelevant for performance. The idea here is that internal and external inertia -- factors such as internal politics, previous investments, organizational norms, competitive pressures and entry and exit barriers -- prevent a CEO from having a meaningful impact of any kind on performance.

Class by class
We expanded the study of CEO education versus performance to include these classes of colleges:
  • Harvard
  • Other Ivy League (Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth, Princeton, the University of Pennsylvania, Yale)
  • Ivy equivalent (Berkeley, MIT, Stanford, University of Chicago)
  • Highly selective but second tier (St. Johns, University of Texas Austin, Naval Academy, etc.)
  • Non-selective (mainly state colleges with open admission policies)
The results show that companies run by the Ivy equivalents performed almost twice as well as those run by the other four groups over the last five years. While the absolute margin of superior performance of some 100 percentage points over a five-year period is meaningful from a practical standpoint, the variability of the data, about 300% standard deviation, make the difference not significantly different from randomness in statistical analysis.

Nevertheless, our study suggests that the Ivy-equivalent CEOs are the best performers. We attribute it partly to the tendency for companies to choose Ivy League CEOs partly on the basis of prestige. Ivy-equivalent executives, on the other hand, are quite as able but are selected based on merit. This translates into performance.

 How the Ivy League CEOs perform on Nasdaq
CEO pedigree Number of companies Stock price gain Jan.-July 2003 5-year stock price gain
Harvard 9 33% 90%
Other Ivy League 7 49% 110%
Ivy equivalent 9 52% 183%
Second tier 9 29% 72%
Other 66 35% 95%
Note: If a CEO earned degrees from different schools, all degrees are counted. Source: Bloomberg Management Profile Database

We thank our colleague Adam Robinson, a co-founder of Princeton Review, for his valuable research and insights on this column. A complete set of all Nasdaq 100 CEOs classified by college is available on our Web site.

advertisement

Final note
An update of our buyback study, showing the performance of all Standard and Poor’s 500 ($INX) companies that repurchased their own shares, is available on our Web site. As our last column will run Sept. 4, after a run of some 180 for this site and some 500 for our previous two sites, we will endeavor to tie all loose ends and answer all urgent reader queries directed to us by e-mail.

Neither Victor Niederhoffer nor Laurel Kenner own or control any of the securities mentioned in this article. Victor has degrees from both Harvard and the University of Chicago. Laurel’s degree is from UCLA.

Rate this article

Would you recommend this article to a friend?
Not a Chance 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Absolutely
 




MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.

Morningstar, Inc. Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2003. All rights reserved.

Standard & Poor's ComStock, Inc.Quotes supplied by Standard & Poor's ComStock, Inc. and are delayed at least 20 minutes.  NYSE, AMEX, and NASDAQ index data are provided real time.

  Try MSN Internet Software for FREE!
  MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail  |  Shopping  |  Money  |  People & Chat  |  Search  

  Help  
  ©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use   Advertise   TRUSTe Approved Privacy Statement   GetNetWise