Mar
14
Unhappy Models, from Larry Williams
March 14, 2013 |
Been traveling a bit in Asia so seeing more billboards in an hour than we have in all of the Virgin Islands. What I noticed is 95% of the ads for upscale clothes, jewelry and such have large photos of models scowling, casting a dour look or an air of haughtiness.
Why is that?
If I was selling clothes I would want my customers to think they might be happy after forking out $300 for a pair of jeans.
Jeff Watson writes:
Talk about dourness, I lived through the grain markets in the 80s, which had a southward gravitational pull for years and years/nobody wanted grains, there was no money in it except for cent and a half trades and the two dollar brokers. Things were so bad that there was no public participation and was a game between only knowledgeable players…..
Just like the state of horse racing today. In the past, the general public (paying too much, selling to cheap and always collecting short, less than true odds even on longshots), would grease the wheels with all that extra cash mostly ending up in the insider's pockets, as always. Back in the old days, 15-20,000 amateurs would regularly take a day off to spend a the races (now you're lucky if 800-1200 show up, all insiders). The insiders would eat the low hanging fruit the public was offering. That low hanging fruit is largely gone, and the game is reduced to just the insiders, the scholarly, and well informed picking each others pockets…… nickel and diming it and devouring each other instead of the schools of bait fish which are largely absent. It's simple ecology 101. As goes for the track, it goes for the markets. I suspect that the Chair could probably expound on this idea 10X better than me (and probably poke enough holes in it to sink the Titanic).
Comments
2 Comments so far
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
It really boils down to this….would I rather take something from a baby or would I rather take something away from a top welterweight?
According to my significant other who works in the fashion industry, having the models smile is salt in the wounds (they’re already skinny, pretty, rich), the happiness accrues to the buyer of the goods not the purveyor…