Nov
26
P.J O’Rourke On the Wealth of Nations, from Victor Niederhoffer
November 26, 2012 |
I am reading the excellent book P.J O'Rourke's On The Wealth of Nations. He gives a general introduction to the wealth and then goes chapter by chapter illuminating the relevance for today of Smith's ideas. Four of the fundamental insights that I find helpful in looking at the present are.
1. Consumption is the sole end and purpose of production. This is a nice thing to keep in mind with all the rebuilding after floods and natural disasters.
2. Self interest is good and natural. Incentives matter. People work harder when pursuing their own interests. In the old days, people had to subject their egos and aspirations but in modern times the breakdown of feudalism has allowed people to pursue happiness.
3. The way to increase wealth is through specialization and division of labor. Eveyone has a comparative advantage at some trade or fancy.
4. Trade creates mutual benefit. Bettering the position of one person in a trade invariably tends to better the position of the other person in the trade. Wealth is not a pizza.
If only those who wish to take from one class like the rich and give to another like the middle class would understand these 4 principles, the world would be a much better place.
Comments
5 Comments so far
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
Quite common read, and in fact will suggest most the same in the last 3 or decades on the subject. This is in no way a poke at the read, but more so I find interesting…!
As,, I have and still suggest the last 2 generations have such a firm belief system that the system of government and the system money itself can ‘withstand’ every thing throw at it.
I think that is the real horror show, few see or even try to observe.
The unraveling of such a belief system is and will be as powerful on the way downward as it was on the way upward.
That is why Fergusson’s book, “When Money Dies” is so important for everyone to read. Full pdf here http://thirdparadigm.org/doc/45060880-When-Money-Dies.pdf
I guess I am a bit more cynical. I don’t think it would matter if the redistributionists understood the 4 principles. It is more of a frog-scorpion situation, not a rational calculation or misunderstanding.
What a throwaway line:
“If only those who wish to take from one class like the rich and give to another like the middle class would understand these 4 principles, the world would be a much better place.
my speculation is that drugs and sex will become less taboo and some legalized thereby passifying the public.