Sep
27
Quote of the Day, from Jeff Watson
September 27, 2012 |
Whatever you think of Agassi, there are several market lessons here, and Agassi must have either read the Chair's books or have been taking lessons.
"Quit going for the knockout, he says. Stop swinging for the fences. All you have to be is solid. Singles, doubles, move the chains forward. Stop thinking about yourself, and your own game, and remember that the guy on the other side of the net has weaknesses. Attack his weaknesses. You don't have to be the best in the world every time you go out there. You just have to be better than one guy. Instead of you succeeding, make him fail. Better yet, let him fail. It's all about odds and percentages. You're from Vegas, you should have an appreciation of odds and percentages. The house always wins, right? Why? Because the odds are stacked in the house's favor. So? Be the house! Get the odds in your favor."
-Agassi, from Open: An Autobiography
Victor Niederhoffer writes:
As usual Agassi has it all wrong–something that can be predicted from an ingrate from a family like his. The only one that can go for singles, that can grind is the house. The player should never grind.
Jim Sogi writes:
Lions and hyenas use a similar strategy when they kill a buffalo or wildebeast. They group up and wound it. They don't go in for the kill. They let it bleed a while, weaken, then tear it up and eat it. Why risk injury when waiting works.
George Parkanyi writes:
What kind of a market lesson is that? "We'll let you stew on your margin call for a while– THEN we'll come and throw you out of your house." ; )
Comments
3 Comments so far
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
Well then Agassi sure had great success in his career. there must be something valid in his comments. For someone who had it all wrong he won 8 grand slam titles and all four of the majors.
Some “grinders” in tennis who come to mind.
Jimmy Connors
Ivan Lendl
Chrissy Evert
They sure had great success by grinding opponents down. I am not sure if Rafa is a grinder since he is not an overwhelming server. But he sure has had great success.
steve. you have a way of misinterpreting or taking specialized points I make and critiquing them that is ineffable. My remarks about grinding related to markets. the idea that a bet on a football game rather than a poll mite be wrong is completely off the point. the point spreads that the houses makes are incredibly accurate and that corresponds to a prediction market. i’ve had to run defense for you for years with your comments here when so many were turned off by them,especially the comments that were shall we say “well known “. similarly with the endless trouble you caused me on the spec list. please dont be so vituperative on this site if you wish us to continue presenting them. vic
I apologize to any who were offended. It is not my raison d’etre to comment here on this website. For the facts, I have not been on your spec list for years. I rarely comment here and when I do it is only if I think it is a positive statement that others may benefit from.
Whenever I have commented it has always been sent through here and if found out of bounds I assumed the Editor had last say as to whether it is released or not.
However you have been most gracious to me on many levels and for that I am eternally grateful.
I would have just thought one thing. If you take such personal offense to my statements and comments I would have thought it more appropriate for you to have expressed them privately since you do have my email rather than on your website which you have full control over content and editing and the power of a public verbal flogging.
Yet I succomb to your wishes and shall restrict any comments going forward, In all humbleness I remain
Your servant,