Sep
16
ECB and Liquidity, from Paolo Pezzutti
September 16, 2011 |
The new ECB plan may add liquidity to the system but I do not see how it can solve the sovereign debt problems, which are getting worse month after month. It seems, however, that Mr Market believes that the story may have a happy ending, which looks totally nonsense to me. In the meantime AAPL is once again near its highs regardless of negative economic data and the fast growth of Android.
Comments
3 Comments so far
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
…but let’s ignore the (continued) fast growth of the iPad2 and the pent-up demand for the iPhone 5
You know markets: they trade on perception, not on reality. Also, often “tail wags dog”. I pointed out last week that WAY too many traders jumped on EUR shorting bandwagon and captured as much as 10 quick figures on way from 1.45 to 1.35 - which is a huge windfall given FX leverage…
Interesting that you mention AAPL but leave out AMZN.
AAPL’s performance perhaps can be rationalized by its business metrics, i.e. PE, earnings growth, balance sheet etc. The question is why AAPL is not valued at least on par with other market darlings when its prospects are stronger and real. Perhaps the answer is its market cap is already too big and it takes too much effort to move the needle.
AMZN’s is pure “blue sky” potential. Its sub-par financial performance is explained away as “investing for the future”. Its upcoming tablet is to be a “game changer” in price and a ramp to its “whole world catalog” merchandise. And it operates on the beggar thy competitor “lowest price” model which we are led to believe will be made up by economy of scale. Fact is, none of its biz lines has much of a moat.
I think the powers that be rotate among a handful of stocks selected on the basis of a plausible blue sky storyline, market cap (not too big like AAPL), float and ownership profile to serve as keystones for the market at large. At one time it was CSCO and until recently NFLX was among the elite group. Relying too much on classical notions of the stock price reflecting quaint calculus of PV based on realistic discounted expectations of free cash flow etc. only clouds our judgment and keeps us from rolling the dice in this casino.