Aug
23

People are lining up in Wesport, CT to sell gold coins, according to a report on Seeking Alpha .
Has anyone ever reliably made profits from bubbles? If so, their existence can be prospectively determined, if not there is no clear answer. It's true that there may be people who know a bubble with 100% certainty, but they don't know where they are in the cycle so they are too worried about shorting them. This is pretty morally equivalent to having no idea about the existence of a bubble, although not quite. I'd say if someone can reliably predict that within a "reasonable" time the bubble will deflate below the current level, and are willing to bet on that, they "know" the bubble exists.
Jeff Watson writes:
Look at the 1980s Hunt Brothers silver debacle. Despite the big move in silver, I never knew anyone that made a boatload of money off of that huge move. I heard lots of tales of people getting rich off the silver market, pyramiding $5,000 into millions, but those people were always friends of friends twice removed, and nobody in my clearing firm, none of my buddies ever nailed silver. I suspect those people who got rich off of the silver market are as elusive or mythical as the Yeti. I also suspect that if you were long that silver market with a $5,000 account that you would have stood a better than even chance going bust.
Rocky Humbert comments:
The Hunt Brothers episode was a corner in an overleveraged market. I'd argue that the gold story today is totally different. Importantly, it's not a leverage-fed, euphoric or happy bull market. It's a funereal bull market. Because if gold is right, and it keeps going and going and going (?5,000? ?10,000 ?20,000 +++) all of one's paper assets will be worth what they are printed on, and the Chair will find out exactly what 2008/09 would have looked like without massive central bank liquidity infusions. (And being short stocks won't help either, since there won't be anyone left to pay you back.)
Hey Gary — for someone who thought total financial collapse was the "ONLY" outcome, how can you NOT be massively long gold??? That's not a bubble! Or is it? As I've been writing for two years now, gold's ascent is a confluence of negative real interest rates; undisciplined central bank behavior; a growing loss of confidence in government policies and financial systems; loss of Swiss bank secrecy; an accumulation of economic wealth by individuals in parts of the world without stable property rights and rule of law; etc. The CME can raise margin requirements all they want; but there needs to be a change in the underlying fundamentals (and/or perception of the fundamentals) to end this period. What will that change look like? Shouldn't that be the question on the table ….
Gary asks, "Can anyone reliably make profits from a bubble?" Hmmmm. Warren Buffett keeps a sealed envelope in his desk drawer with the name of his successor. In contrast, I keep a sealed envelope in my desk drawer with the EXACT high price in gold. Neither of us allow any peeking (or peaking.)
Note to Anatoly: You recently wrote that you think gold won't go all the way back down. If you believe that this is a genuine bubble, then you'll have been wrong on the way up. And on the way down. See Jeremy Gratham's extensive work on bubbles — and his observation that they retrace >100% of the parabolic extension.
Stefan Jovanovich says:
The U.S. Treasury had enough gold to be able to promise to redeem the customer balances of every member bank of the Federal Reserve in the United States in 1930; had that step been taken, the U.S. would not have suffered the extraordinary collapse in demand that created the death spiral of world trade
Tyler McClellan asks:
Stefan,
Just for fun, how would you have lowered real interest rates in the US, without dramatically widening the gold points, or say just abandon them all together.
Stefan Jovanovich replies:
Why would I want to administer interest rates at all? The problem with the Federal Reserve system is that its underlying premise is that the government should do so. Nothing can prevent speculation from having a component of folly and ruin — like all of life. The idea that the government — which is itself an interest group of the employees and beneficiaries of government borrowing and spending — can somehow avoid the same folly and ruin in its speculations seems to me to be the funniest of all the lunar illusions. Remove the notion that somehow banking is a special kind of business that requires absolute government guarantee (which, as we have seen, the government cannot afford any more than anyone else) and a great deal of the folly and ruin disappears because the truth — that everyone in commerce works without a net — is transparent. As someone once said, the illusion of safety is the most dangerous of all ideas.
Comments
5 Comments so far
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
My opinion is that someone deciding to Short gold is not necessarily sure he’s shorting bubble; he is just a part of the “value-seeking” camp. Currently, the accelerated move from $1500 to $1900 creates such shorting value - but certainly no screaming bubble is obvious.
I don’t think bubble is necessary for any bull market to reverse into bear. My opinion (that Gold will probably not fall much below $800 in its bear) is based strictly on the devalued price scale. When next gold bottom occurs, $253 of 1999 will be worth $753 - that’s all I’m saying
If its high then you might as well sell gold if you have it.
Watched my share of post apocalyptic Armageddon type movies in my day, there are plenty, the common theme among survivors is not a pocket full of gold, but liberal amounts of common sense.
What shall happen in the collapse of fiat currency worldwide, when paper currency has no value? Will I trade my brokerage statement with claim on ETF gold for bread in the market? Or can I exchange that paper for physical gold and carve off a gram at the local BP when I fill up the tank? Will those retail outlet’s continue to exist on the gold standard, will the counterparties come through and deliver my gold against my paper, or do I simply sit hungry at home on my gold bars until Death knocks at the door and while eagerly offering up my gold for my life, he salaciously takes both.
“I’d say if someone can reliably predict that within a “reasonable” time the bubble will deflate below the current level, and are willing to bet on that, they “know” the bubble exists.”
I think that perhaps the money is made in bubbles by being slightly long before the public spot it and patient about timing your exit - holding on for those periods where “it can’t possibly go higher” and selling out after it does. Personally, I liquidated on Thursday, and got rid of my physical towards the end of last month. I see at least a three month correction and a significant possibility of a longer term top. No point in being greedy, and it looks like the papers are already printing $2,000 as if it is a done deal. Recall how we made a significant high at $1,000 a few years back, and if memory serves we came off by at least 30%. However, I don’t have a clue if this is the top and therefore did not go short for anything except a quick daytrade.
Who really knows what 2008/9 would have looked like without these “liquidity infusions”? Whenever I hear people talk in these terms I suspect that they do not really know either, but support the policy and are appealing to fear. All I see is state intervention where it isn’t desired and a transfer of wealth to those who have the correct “pull”.
Yes, bubble deflation is usually significant - both in magnitude and speed of descent. I think this reason alone attracts shorts into the market to pick tops in bubbles hoping for the “big score”. There is an interesting point made by Jeff Watson above, and perhaps “the big score” in the markets is just another myth kept alive as there are some elements of the public who will pin their hopes on it and use it to justify reckless, foolish, or plain incorrect participation in the markets. It is quite possible that even very good traders do not predict the full magnitude of bubbles in advance, correctly pyramid, and get the top exactly. Don’t let this get in the way of the public’s hope and greed however.
If the public’s-a-sellin’, then I’m-a-buyin’.