Jul
25
Those Were the Days, from Roy Niederhoffer
July 25, 2011 |
A marvelous passage from A.J.P. Taylor’s English History; 1914-1945? :
Until August 1914 a sensible law-abiding Englishman could pass through life and hardly notice the existence of the state, beyond the post office and the policeman. He could live where he liked and as he liked. He had no official number or identity card. He could travel abroad or leave his country forever without a passport or any sort of official permission. He could exchange his money for any other currency without restriction or limit. He could buy goods from any country in the world on the same terms as he bought goods at home. For that matter, a foreigner could spend his life in this country without permit and without informing the police.
Unlike the countries of the European continent, the state did not require its citizens to perform military service. An Englishman could enlist, if he chose, in the regular army, the navy or the territorials. He could also ignore, if he chose, the demands of national defence. Substantial householders were occasionally called on for jury service. Otherwise, only those helped the state who wished to do so.’
‘The Englishman paid taxes on a modest scale; nearly $400 million in
1913-14, or rather less than 8% of the national income. The state intervened
to prevent the citizen from eating adulterated food or contracting certain infectious diseases. It imposed safety rules in factories, and prevented women, and adult males in some industries, from working excessive hours. The state saw to it that children received education up to the age of 13. Since 1 January 1909, it provided a meagre pension for the needy over the age of70. Since 1911, it helped to insure certain classes of workers againstsickness or unemployment.’‘This tendency towards more state action was increasing. Expenditure on the social services had roughly doubled since the Liberals took office in 1905. Still, broadly speaking, the state acted ony to help those who could not help themselves. It left the adult citizen alone.’
‘All this changed by the impact of the Great War.’
Comments
4 Comments so far
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
Thanks for this. I didn’t know it.
Too bad the poor Englishman in 1914 lived a life that could be described as nasty, brutish and short. His life expectancy was below the actual age of a great proportion of the writers of these freedom-loving posts. No national healthcare of any kind meant nasty teeth, no vaccination, no check-ups, nothing until he coughed up blood, and then still not much. An ability to trade freely meant that he had possibly been fired from the textile mills and knew what starvation meant. The common good was something he read about, a dream for his grandchildren in the bright future that awaited humanity. Ha. No wonder so many people thought Communism must be the answer.
Dan, excellent point. But Brits to this day have horrendous teeth
. Communism/Socialism is not the answer. Truly educated population is, but that will mean automatic redistribution of wealth (so there is no way that is happening).
Some Days More Than Others…
The government took over control of the railroads with a committee of managers in 1913, whereby it (the government) also guaranteed that year’s dividend…
In principle, how is that government encroachment into the private sector any different that the recent bailout of the US financial system?
The King of English nor Parliament could stand for having their friends and colleagues risk lost on their investment. Or was it the precursor of war?
Will not the same be said a la post-crisis 2008?
No doubt, as Dan alludes, the English class system was perverse in the context of social-economic justice, whereby Communism became appealing to some of those at the bottom rung and downtrodden. Five years in Communist China, I have come to understand how “the sins of capitalism” give birth to “the evils of communism” — look at the histories of the axis of evil today (China, North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam).
Bad teeth…? Take survey of those four…
dr