Jun
17
Mystical Ideas, from Victor Niederhoffer
June 17, 2011 |
Recently I have posited that the market to an inordinate degree shows the main attributes in its daily moves of the most vivid sports game that has not been used. I would add to this that during each hour the market is likely to move to the rhythms and dynamics of the most likely classical music being played on a classical music station in home town, for example the former WQXR in New York, in full knowledge that these programs are often selected 2 months in advance, and noting that I was a subscriber to same when I was 12 years old.
I am adding to my list of mystical encampments and predictions that the fortunes of Apple and Lady Gaga will follow a similar arc in the future, and as soon as the Lady loses her luster, or a substantial base of her gay support, Apple will be ready to nose dive.
Do you feel that because of these ideas that I should resign my post as chair of Dailyspec which is designed to deflate ballyhoo, or is this just a symptom of that predilection that old men such as the Sage and the Fake Doc have to maintain their romantic aura?
Henrik Andersson writes:
As an engineer I can be accused of being too focused on science. One of my mystical ideas right now is that I believe the market will turn once these four companies reached the round 4. In Chinese '4' is an unlucky number as it sounds similar to 'death'. That's why for example there are no Nokia product lines that begin with '4'. Marine Harvest will at a salmon price of NOK 28 post an EPS of 0.40 in 2012e. At PE 10x, the stock is going to NOK 4, Maersk profit warning is getting closer whearas i believe 40k will be reached. June also seems to the peak season for ordering new vessels, Husqvarna has been on a straight path from SEK 50 to 40 with the CFO canned and the CEO watching the share price decline from the hospital bed. Nokia is this morning getting very close to EUR 4.00. I just read yesterday they are now making more money on iPhone sales (they are getting royalty) than their own sales. The market needs to 'die' before it can rise again, and these stock will in the process all hit 4.
Comments
4 Comments so far
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
A recent book, Believing B_llshit, by a Brit philosopher argues that appealing to belief, mystery or mysticism in an argument or debate is tantamount to "going nuclear" or tipping over the checker board as it were. The book makes a strong case for debunking these untestable statements using the scientific method.
Here's a recent interview link with the author…
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21028160.200-a-field-guide-to-bullshit.html?full=true
why are they lowering margin requirements in the treasuries? this is manipulation isn’t it?
in place of crying manipulation, test this: nominal yield “numbers” are getting smaller, thus reducing potential daily fluctuations. No one cries when margins are reduced for low-priced commodities, right?
“reducing daily fluctutians” what about last week? Maybe I’m
the sucker though, all too possible.