Mar
10
Calendar Spread, from Laurence Glazier
March 10, 2011 |
I am sorely tempted, having bought a far out of the money position expiring in October, to offset the cost by selling nearer term options in the coming months. Were it a blitz chess game I would play this move immediately. But as I am resolved to stay within a rigorous preset plan, I am sitting on my hands.
Phil McDonnell adds:
One strategy you could think about is calendar rolls. Sell the March, let it expire, then the Apr and so on. If the underlying reaches the strike price, dump it all. That will be your peak profit.
Laurence Glazier responds:
After thinking more I've realized it is probably best not to sell nearer term calls against the one I hold. A good job I sat on my hands.
My positions are carefully selected to have a chance of doubling in value, and if this happens I close them.
I imagine that converting to a calendar spread would not be compatible (the short call would weigh against the profits). But selling a call expiring at the same date but more out of the money would, I suspect, make doubling more likely and might increase my choice of candidate positions - though there would be more commission charges.
Of 10 positions I have thus far closed since starting this strategy in November, 5 doubled– so I think it worth keeping the plan going.
Comments
2 Comments so far
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
I second that. You can roll tactically whenever the underlying makes a healthy move in your favor and you want to hedge the profits. Depending on the instrument, you can even do this every week, making it more likely that you’ll pay for your position, as long as the underlying is making some progress toward the strike.
“That will be your peak profit.”
What Dr McDonnell means, no doubt, is that the position is at its peak profit *at a given moment in time* when underlying == strike. Of course, the profit of the position might increase the next day. This might go without saying, but it can’t hurt to be extra clear.
“If the underlying reaches the strike price, dump it all.”
This might be an empirical finding of his, though he doesn’t put the numbers on the table. It certainly isn’t an a-priori property of options, as per above.