Apr
4
Shocking Map of Unemployment Data, from Newton Linchen
April 4, 2010 |
Unemployment Map of U.S-2007 TO 2010
Scary and Real!
Please review this Unemployment map of the United States. This is hard to believe, but TRUE! I had to review this map a couple of times to grasp the enormity of it. Watch the map automatically update from 2007 to 2010… WOW!
Nigel Davies comments:
The scary part may be the symbolic use of colors. Having black (death, nothingness, annihilation) for anything from 10-100% seems almost deliberately misleading and the map looks like a rotting piece of meat. There's probably a similar effect in chess, with players playing White often tending towards optimism whilst Black positions can have a look of doom about them. And you can deliberately magnify the effect by playing cramped looking defenses and even placing the pieces slightly towards the back of the squares. BTW, you get a similar psychological effect with candlesticks, the mind being subtly influenced to see down days (black candles) as being doom-laden whilst white ones appear to offer hope. A good practice may be to use green for down and a neutral gray for up, and maybe do something similar with one's Bollinger bands (black as the upper band, pink or something for the lower one).
John Lamberg writes:
Many years ago, a wise professor taught me the visual power of choice of scale when preparing a X versus Y graph.
Comments
2 Comments so far
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
Let's start by asking what the natural rate of unemployment would be, or should be. Economists have generally considered 5% natural. According to Larry Summers, 4% unemployment was considered desirable in the 1960s, though 7% later ("Over time, the unemployment rate drifted upward and, for the most part, has hovered around 7 percent. Lately, it has fallen to 5 percent." (http://econlib.org/library/Enc/Unemployment.html )
By "natural unemployment" economists mean that it is natural in a dynamic economy for some workers to quit and spend time looking for new jobs, and natural for some industries to shrink, laying off workers as technologies and consumer preferences to change.
With this background, the Jan. 2007 chart should show most of the country colored red or bright red for "dangerously" low levels of unemployment. Maybe 4% would be the same yellow-orange for caution, but lower levels would be colored red for stop or danger. 5-7% would be green for go and normal, and over 8% or 10% darker. My earlier post argued that higher unemployment today is in part a healthy response to the artificially low unemployment of the earlier bubble economy. Like the hangover that follows drinking too much, high unemployment is an ndicator of needed labor adjustment in process. Though also some of the unemployment is a consequence of regulatory intervention (such as arbitrarily higher minimum wage regulations, higher taxes, and uncertainty about future interventions).
This 2007-2009 chart animation is the flip side of the misguided employment gains from 2003-2006, when millions switched jobs to build houses that buyers could not afford, and millions more shifted to produce goods and services for the artificially stimulated construction industry. (See: "The House that Uncle Sam Built" for details: http://fee.org/doc/the-house-that-uncle-sam-built/ )
This is where the damage was done in real estate, where land, labor, and raw materials were purchased, and the finished products soon had less value than the raw materials. Wealth was destroyed and economic coordination disrupted.
The 2007-2009 chart shows the beginning of the complex clean-up process where workers, resources, and companies began adjusting to real-world conditions, all in the face of new and unprecedented government interventions into financial, insurance, automobile, and health care industries.
[…] leave a comment » Check out the Unemployment Map that’s over on Daily Speculations and be prepared for a shock, especially if you are a visual type. Still, things were much worse in the late 70’s-early 80’s. I remember when I got out of college, there were no jobs to be had at all. I had to create my own job after college, and I suspect that many people are doing just that. I’m not as bearish as many are, as I realize we need a bad panic/crisis/depression to wash out all the excess and old growth from the system. Excessive government regulation is not allowing the free market forces to cleanse the business cycle and is making things worse. Still, there are ways of profiting from all of this, and it is for the prescient to determine what methods to use to profit. […]