Mar
13
U to the Tenth Power, by Victor Niederhoffer
March 13, 2010 |
It is interesting to speculate about what happens when the market is up 10 days in a row and then again at the open, since this has never happened before so one can't do it. This is a quandary for frequentists and perhaps mysteries of the Bacons, Dave and our readers could shed light, as I can't.
Alston Mabry writes:
I'm looking at SPY closes, only one peak higher than this, back in Sep 1995, 12 up days in a row. lt's like standing on K2 and being able to see Everest from there. But maybe I'm just tossing coins…
Bruno Ombreux comments:
I found a funny rule in Statistical Rules of Thumb, by Gerald van Belle, called the Rule of Threes: "Given no observed events in n trials, a 95% upper bound on the rate of occurrence is 3/n." There is one very simple demonstration based on the Poisson distribution.
Victor Niederhoffer comments:
The van Belle rule would say that in 1000 repetitions, it would be 19 to 1, that a decline would occur less than 300 occasions (i.e. a probability of 3/10), a truly precise but completely misleading answer in this case, especially when the underlying base estimate is 0.5. Sort of the way people talk about Microsoft's answer to a help question. However, in this case I predict a decline of 0.25, just to make the people waiting for a reversal crazy and even poorer.
Comments
4 Comments so far
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
This speculation supposes that the appropriate unit of time over which to conjecture is a “day” and not an hour or a minute or a week or a month. Or semi-biweekly as I used to hold management meeting every Monday. It also recalls my utter amazement in high school that learning after flipping a coin heads 10 times in a row, the odds of the next individual flip being heads is still 50%. As are the odds of being up or down today, all other things being equal.
My second grade daughter has memorized Pi to the 50th digit in honor of Pi day coming up Sunday (3/14) – at 1: 59AM the real enthusiasts like to celebrate. Among other useless but nevertheless fascinating tasks like speculating the next flip of the market coin.
So sure we are up 10 days in a row, nearly 50 points, but then I went to look at the last two years and found a couple individual days up or down more than that in both nominal and percentage terms, and a handful of days both up AND down by that much, and even, one or two hours shifting nearly than much.
So I am still hunting an elusive secret from this data that will assist me to turn the dollar in my pocket into two by tomorrow, or next week, or next month, or in time for the next semi bi weekly report to my lovely household investment committee.
Perhaps of more insight would be to understand the hazards that the “mountaineers” (traders) have to endure as prices climb towards the summit.
1) Falling rocks/ice = Profit-taking periods. Does the mountaineer stay the course or not?
2) Avalanches = Unexpected price drops from news/events. Stop-losses getting hit.
3) Crevasses & Fall from rocks = Gap downs.
4) Altitude sickness = Greed. Leverage-up of gains and disregard for risk.
5) Weather/Solar radiation = Market changing cycles.
6) Volcanic activity = Margin call. Speculator sees the “lava” coming down his/her way, but altitude sickness will entice more risk taking and double downs.
How can one develop a systematic approach to reach the summit and avoid all the listed hazards?
Just seems like it wants to keep going up. You like when you walk outside it smells like Baseball.
Tennis Royalty?
Sampras and Agassi joking around at charity game until Andre goes a little too far regarding Pete's miserly ways in tipping as he also spoke of in his recent book. I feel embarrassed for Nadal and Federer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QSK9t6OrgU