Dec
18
Briefly Speaking, from Victor Niederhoffer
December 18, 2009 |
At least there was a 16 point range for the first day above 10 in the last 8 with 2 million volume, thereby letting the public switch out of good and stop out when the margin and uncle point overly trepidatious.
As collab notes, gold and the S&P crossed and the Nikkei and the S&P always crossing. A study of crosses would be good. What other ones would be good?
Quarterly expiration within a hair's breadth of Dec 1000 looking to cause consternation.
Corn seems to hit 400 with disproportionately large frequency.
Grains very close to where they were 100 years ago, showing that inflation and commodity bulls are charlatans.
The antitrust actions against the technology leader have to seem a pall to all businesses and investors similar to those that have led so many times to crashes in the last 150 years, but this must be quantified.
Also to be quantified are the changing relations of leaks of important information in the well worn corridors. An Ellsworth Vines can no longer play tennis on the clay courts of Pennsylvania Avenue to get a dispensation for the leader of his pro tour.
Comments
4 Comments so far
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
The Chair writes: “Grains very close to where they were 100 years ago, showing that inflation and commodity bulls are charlatans.”
Fact check, please.
According to the CRB Yearbook, in 1909, wheat was trading at 55. Last print 550. Compounded rate of return is 4.75%. Likewise, in 1909, corn was trading at 40, last print 400. Compounded rate of return is 4.75%.
Sir: I may be a fool. But I’m not a charlatan. If this isn’t “inflation,” then what is?
As my previous commented admitted, I may be a fool. This is confirmed by the fact that I placed my decimal point in the wrong place. But my point remains …
Yes, you're no charlatan, but 3% a year compounded and a 10 fold increase are much less than the triumphal 10000 fold returns, wouldn't you say? Starting points must be considered also. vic
Corn is an especially interesting commodity. If you are looking at *cash* corn, perhaps the correct way would be to compare prices relative to where we are in what I call the ‘thirty year’ bull markets. Of course, there is no way of knowing if the top is now in, or if we will put it in with an actual supply problem rather than a perceived possible problem.
Of course, what makes corn so interesting is the relentless trend of the adjusted rollover contract, assuming a person is trading futures and not cash. Nothing else I have seen exhibits such a strong and relentless bias.