Feb
19
In Honor of Ken Smith, from Steve Ellison
February 19, 2009 |
Here is an account of life aboard ship from the article "Slow Boat to China".
But merchant seamen are an odd group. They spend months at sea, away from their families, tending to what is essentially a giant diesel-powered truck … Mutterers and quiet drinkers, most of them — cordial, but with rich interior lives that I'm sure would have alarmed me if I'd known too much about them. At meals (I ate with the officers), the group had a focused energy and kept the talk to a minimum … there wasn't a lot of lingering at the table, spinning tales of the sea. Later, in the lounge, there was purposeful drinking. And then sleep, if you could without rolling out of bed with every pitch and yaw of the ship.
I had expected a certain glamour to the crew — a kind of a Foreign Legion vibe, men on the run from the law or themselves, Bogart types — but that really isn't what efficient international trade requires. What's needed to power and guide vessels like the Hanjin Miami are mechanics to keep the engine running, oilers to keep it oiled, and a master to download the appropriate GPS and weather information from the satellite."
"A ship the size of the Hanjin Miami can haul more than 7,000 containers … giant shoeboxes that can go pretty effortlessly from ship to railroad to truck trailer. Modern freight transport is the product of a flash of insight by an American trucking magnate named Malcom [sic] McLean, who devised a system for loading, unloading, and hauling standardized shipping containers in the 1950s. Until he came along, cargo had to be loaded and unloaded piece by piece. McLean streamlined the process, managed to cut almost 95 percent of the cost of overseas shipping, … and ushered in the biggest, widest economic boom in history."
"[W]hat started as a writer's retreat … became instead a front-row seat to the world's economic slump. America doesn't make; it buys. And when America stops buying, the whole system shuts down."
Comments
2 Comments so far
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
Steve, thank you. In China, I am docking with the notion that a simple geometric equation (distance) explains how we have trended to our current state of market conditions and corresponding levels of valuation.
In politics, one may study how distance correlates to efficiency and effectives of a polity. One may posit how, geographically, the further away the locality of a public servant (elected or appointed) from the electorate, the less productive is the governing process in terms of state-input-output relative to either, taxes or policies?
Consider how most states must address budget deficit and surplus issues compared to the federal government. May not the same now be implied with most global and electronic market ecologies?
Do American consumers see price correlations relative to Chinese producers?
Until moving to and living in China, I did not, nor do I recall market input (e.g., environment, labor, and other regulatory aspects) presented in nonecometric formulations for consumer choice — granted, though, reflected in price action a la Wal-Mart-like distribution and marketing schemes.
Yet those same market correlations are determinative in producer/distributor (or retailer) formulations. So how may one explain the “disconnect” whereby valuations appear to present technical not fundamental (or value, embodying social and economic considerations) pricing structures?
My answer is distance.
Your observations are unique in that you objectify that same phenomenon between points A and B. Relative market ecologies seem to so quantify, though, only relative to (not between) points A and B as being operative for price action. Thus social valuation occurring relative to transactional analysis is only quantified within that state (or context).
Consider how markets quantify the human and social cost relative to a little girl here in China diagnosed last year with Leukemia… http://xiaodu2008.blogspot.com/.
I continue to ponder the process that markets did so with an American boy who died from that disease at age 13, some 25 years ago in Maine.
Who did it?
A to B; birth to death – between is the voyage.
Is it the captain or the quartermaster?
dr
Ken Smith also initiated one of the more lively debates here by positing that financial engineering had less value than producing real goods. Prescient is the word that comes to mind.