Feb
4
DCA, from Phil McDonnell
February 4, 2009 |
If one can predict the market then there are better techniques than Dollar Cost averaging. But DCA is a decent strategy if two conditions hold:
- One cannot predict the market.
- One has an external income source available to be invested regularly.
Leveraged ETFs can grind investors up in unexpected ways because of the daily rebalancing. I suspect he will see that these ETFs are the exact opposite of a DCA strategy. In DCA your investment buys more shares after a dip and acquires fewer shares after a market rise. Overall your average share price is below the average of the market prices.
Leveraged ETFs employ the exact opposite strategy. When the market rises they are forced to buy more shares. When it falls they are forced to sell shares to maintain their constant leverage ratio. The net result is they buy shares at an average price above the average of market prices over the period. Thus the levered ETFs use an anti-DCA and that is what causes the grind.
Dr. McDonnell is the author of Optimal Portfolio Modeling, Wiley, 2008
Larry Williams comments:
I would add a third condition: Markets make new highs.
Comments
11 Comments so far
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
The gaps on the open are often so large that it doesn’t matter what the market does for the next hour or whatever as the gap corrects. Maybe it’s individual investor freaking out on overnight news but it was interesting to watch last year with the volatility.
DCA is but another strategy that can be used among many. Dogs of the Dow may very well work this year. There is no perfect strategy, perfection is not to be found in this world. Only in the hereafter. The perfect strategy is to buy at the bottom of a trough and sell the peak. But we know nobody has perfected this strategy nor any strategy. Any seasoned veteran already knows this. It is mere sophistry to argue this point. Moving on, I think a great philosophy I learned long ago. when you leave a position leave with something left on the table for the next guy. There is no such thing as getting out at the top. That is a canard. This is because the markets have no time limit, they do not end. We do. Our goal in life is to get our piece of the pie. How we get there is up to us. sl.
Steve, Is there any substance at all to what you wrote? There have been a lot of interesting points back and forth on this subject, and I am worried that I am missing a gem in what on the surface appears to be mostly meaningless platitudes, as any seasoned veteran would know. Please enlighten me, as you normally provide much useful insight. Thanks.
Steve Leslie is incorrect. There do exist perfect strategies. My strategies have never failed me; I have never had a losing trade, or even single day without positive profits, in my over 35 years of trading experience, so I know whereof I speak.
Larry: I don't know whether your comment was tongue-in-cheek. But if it was not, then I believe that you are incorrect. There is no requirement for new highs. The return of dollar cost averaging is =
r = [ P{F}/ p'{P} minus 1 ]
where P{F} is the final price of the investment
p'{P} is the harmonic mean of the purchase price
Remember that you are buying more shares at lower prices, so the harmonic mean drops quickly to the market.
The only situation where DCA will not EVENTUALLY show a positive return would be a situation where the stock market goes to zero, and stays there.
Here is the math of the DCA calculation:
http://tsp.peacefulgains.com/Derivation-of-the-dollar-cost-averaging-return-formula/
Steve reminded me of my spiffy dressed, aristocratic British accent spoken, never losing his suntan, most eligible 50-something bachelor, Microeconomics 101 Professor Bixley: "My goal in life is to die with my debts maximized. Cheerio!"
Most of my writings and perhaps my life are meaningless platitudes. Yet my point is imperfect strategies abound because we are imperfect. And only Madoff had a perfect strategy except for the part about getting away with the scheme.
Or one could read "The Little Book That Beats The Market" by Joel Greenblatt, and suggested by Steve as in DCA this might be a nice time to employ… maybe
I promise no rant: To Larry and the Doc.
A few scenarios where DCA works and how to use it. buying company stock in a 401k. Before the implosion of Enron, Citi, Home Depot and others, many people retired millionaires as a result of DCA into their company stock. There are clerks at Wal-Mart and secretaries from IBM who now live very comfortably. So the system can work provided you work for a company not engaged in financial shenanigans. The tax law used to be that after 59 1/2 you can remove the company stock and it is treated as ltcg rather than ordinary income. Check with your tax advisor on this one. I have Morgan Stanley in my 401k and although the stock is way down from its high of the 80's in '07 the dividends are being reinvested into more stock. Hopefully when I plan on taking money out the shares will be much higher.
Another is in an Annuity. Let's say that you want to make a lump sum investment into an annuity. Put it in the fixed account and DCA the money into the sub-accounts over weeks, months and even years. This strategy eliminates the pressure of deciding when to invest the money and to at least commit oneself to an investment plan.
A third is to buy a mutual fund, and reinvest dividends and capital gains, a popular strategy. This is a form of DCA.
With great respect to Larry; of course you will make more money if the investment is higher than the average cost of shares when you cash out. However, if you are DCA you want the shares to remain low during the investment phase. The philosophy I believe is predicated more on behavioral psychological factors than market factors and one has at least an investment plan which should be better than no plan at all.
See that was not painful unlike waking up to wind chill of 20 in Melbourne Florida. Now I could rant on this if u like.
It's interesting to ponder how we might act if perfection was possible. I'm currently reading In Search of Perfection, a cookbook by British Chef Heston Blumenthal after watching the BBC series of the same name. In the book Heston seeks to "perfect" some popular dishes like Treacle Tart and pizza. His method is interesting combining taste testing, a survey of historical recipes and scientific literature to produce his own take on the perfect recipe. I wonder if it might be possible to dissect the perfect trade (Soros's bet against the pound?)
Perhaps one seeking profits should short the ultra-long rather than go long the ultra-short, and logically the converse, particularly when experiencing moderate to high volatility.