Oct
13
American Banker, from Edward Talisse
October 13, 2008 |
Would it be wise to speculate a little now consciously in the investment account in which bankers were speculating so unconsciously and so unwisely in 1929?
That's from the May 12, 1933 issue of "American Banker". I guess most bankers answered a resounding NO back in 1933 just like they are answering today. That quote reminds me of a little anecdote from a few years back . A Japanese fund manager was greeted with resounding ridicule when he talked about the Japanese approach to buy stocks only when prices are rising aggressively rather than waiting for a market drop. His reasoning was that buying stocks with rising prices will insulate the portfolio manager from criticism if he should fall. The portfolio manager could easily justify his buy decision by stating that everyone was buying and he was just part of the herd. If the manager bought a depressed stock that fell further, he would be accused of individualism and subject to scorn. It always amazes me how circular the world is. Today's chumps are tomorrow's heroes. Be humble or prepare to be humbled, as the saying goes.
Comments
2 Comments so far
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
Immensely important point Mr. Talisse. The profoundness of such a statement is of amazing relevance.
This reminds me back to 1999 when nearly every mutual fund of consequence owned the big technology names. Cisco,Oracle,Microsoft,Ebay,Amazon, yahoo,jdsu and so forth. No more than a dozen names were carrying the Naz to the 5000 mark. You get the point. Value stocks were anathema. Yet post 2000 they became quite popular. Reason: value stocks had true value in them.
The heuristic was the same then as it is now and as it shall be 20 years from now. Money managers lose their jobs based on relative performance in their peer group. Individuals such as Peter Lynch, Ralph Wanger, Bill Miller, Heebner, and a few others are true outliers. The rest are merely lemmings. Senators and Congressmen and women keep their jobs not for what they do but for what they don't do. Like making great mistakes and foul-ups. Look at Spitzer. He burned his bridges with his Democratic supporters, gets caught in an affair with a prostitute and there was nobody left to protect him.
The speculator takes advantage of this bias and zigs when the mainstream intelligentsia zags.
mutual fund outflows on Friday were $8.8 Billion and on track for an all-time record for the month. already $45 Billion liquidated. Any contrarians will point out that that is an indicator of a capitulation. There are others, but this is a good start.