Apr
19
Dow Theory, from Kim Zussman
April 19, 2008 |
Now with a Dow Theory buy signal hit, big up week, breakout to many week high and >100d moving average, we get a real-time test of positive momentum in stocks.
We never hit the "bear market" cutoff of -20% from the October (all time) high. Presumably they will conclude this was a nascent recession doused out by Helicopter Ben; definitely not what NBER's Feldstein was calling for. Those hoping for a big drop to buy will have to wait for another financial bail-out, which won't happen until we are back to 1500 as everyone piles in afraid to miss the rebound.
Or not.
You can pick your poison or you can pick your antidote. But you can't know the antidote for your poison.
Comments
5 Comments so far
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
Well Dr. Zussman,
We may not have touched the “bear market” threshold, but we grazed it close enough to pick up a lot of the vibe by induction. I have a couple of stocks in the ol’ folio that went from the 40’s to the teens. Still felt one or two electric shocks.
However, not to worry - have only done fractionally worse than the market overall, so it’s no big deal in the grand scheme of things. If the trend is your friend, then time is your guardian angel.
Cheers,
GP
Although not directly related to Kim’s post, I respectfully submit my thoughts on an interesting subject.
Friday, during morning rituals, an online news scan uncovered a most unusual find; 5.2 earthquake rocks Illinois; felt 450 miles away. Now, Left-Coasters may scoff at such a seemingly mild event, until you realize seismic waves propagate much more efficiently through the comparatively uniform geology of the Midwest, than through the highly fractured and folded geology commonly found west of the Great Plains. Regionally, on a generational time-scale, this event was truly rare and historic; and for me a bit exciting, though fortunately not producing significant widespread property damage.
A number of research seismologists posit that an earthquake similar to Friday’s could precipitate, albeit with unknown delay, a more energetic event, especially along the New Madrid (named for New Madrid, Mo.) area fault complex, which has a great store of potential energy, comprised of pent-up compression and shear forces. Violent energy released from New Madrid could cause far-reaching devastation, due to seismically deficient engineering found within civic infrastructure and architecture. Catastrophically affected areas would likely include prominent population centers such as St. Louis, Nashville, and Memphis (imagine Bam, Iran type masonry damage).
Subconsciously, probably while savoring oft-touted LDL lowering Ch**rios along with strawberries and coffee, connections were made. Successful market participants should ascertain how the seismic waves of finance propagate through the varying geology of the markets, locate sources of potential energy and profit from detecting deficient financial infrastructure susceptible to devastation during violent energy release.
However, to glean and utilize this information, problems need to be solved. What various market seismograms and strain sensor readings can a speculator study? With foresight, how does one discern a probable violent release of energy, from a more gradual dissipation process?
RJ
I am very glad that Mssr. Zussman mentioned the Dow Theory. Richard Russell is one of the oldest supporters of Dow Theory first writing on this subject in 1958. That was one year after I was born. Many consider his insights to be very respected.
I have often wondered who came up with the magical number of 20% to signify a bear market. Why doesn’t 15 or 18 percent suffice, why does it have to be 20?
I think back to “Cool Hand Luke” when dragline played by George Kennedy asks Luke played by Paul Newman why he had to say he could eat 50 eggs in one hour when he could have said 30 or 35. Luke’s reply was “It seemed like a nice round number to me.”
sl.
FedEx is interesting to watch since it led the decline. Recently, it failed to make a new high when the Transports and overall market did. Also, the last two bouts of market weakness came after a month rally, so we’re at the telling point again. Previously, it was followed by 3 weeks of weakness. Arms index is similar to previous turns, so seems like a pretty significant place we’re at.
Bob Johnson’s comments on the New Madrid fault are right on. Two books that I like to reread are Remnances of a Stock Operator and Climate and the Affairs of Man by Browning/Winkless. December’s highest tidal pressure in 92 years has a good chance of triggering the New Madrid fault, according to Browning. The increased gueyser activity in Yellowstone, increased earthquake activty, and increased volcanic activity are all the result of a more direct alignment of earth, sun, and moon (perihelion, perigee). The earth’s egg shaped orbit due to Jupiter’s pull comes closest to the sun around year-end, so that’s why we get the biggest triggers then. The moon orbit often slants, so when it comes in a more straight alignment, it adds a sharper pull. The tsunami that killed all those people was the previous increased tidal pull the year-end full moon. The more direct alignment shows up in the eclipse data over the next 10 years. We have 3 or more eclipses of the sun or moon in nearly every year it looks like. We haven’t had 3 or more since the 2001 recession. NASA’s data goes back to 1900 and you can see most of the financial problems came around 3 or more. The volcanic activity cools and makes for tougher growing conditions. I was talking with Gail Dudak a while back and she said she’s always noticed more earthquake activity in bear markets but didn’t know why. Browning’s book was written in the 1970s but is sometimes available on the web. He notes that the Mississippi is our major outlet for shipping grain, so the New Madrid fault can cause a lot of problems. Over 100 years ago, it rerouted the river leaving a nice big lake in Tennessee.