Apr
11
The Silo, from Victor Niederhoffer
April 11, 2008 |
The silo that a certain conglomerate might like to use to fill earnings with sales of grain and other assets purchased 100 years ago, might have run dry today and its stock dropped to its lowest level since June '04. Like a pressure cooker whose valve was finally released, the market, after staying with a hair of unchanged the whole week, including its Friday 6:00 GMT level of 1368, finally burst the dam, and dropped a fast 35 before closing down a mere 2% on the major US and European markets. The last healthy gasps were in Japan and Asia with the Nikkei up 2.5% and other Asia markets up 1% to 3%. Amazingly this earnings report was not released before the announcement to the big boys, and the staggering immediate 1.5% drop that ensued in the minutes after the announcement must have been dismaying to all who are accustomed to fair warnings on things of this nature. It reminds one of the Charles Addams cartoons about the old couple that manages to put up a facade of happiness for many years, until a small incident, perhaps the failure to take out the garbage, causes an explosion.
Alan Millhone enquires:
It amazes me that the first time 17% drop in one quarterly earnings report in over five years for the conglomerate drives down the market by almost 260 tics. Also Vic's mention of 'time delay' release of sensitive financial information reminds me of the ruse in The Sting, where they used delayed track reporting over the wire service to dupe Robert Shaw (who played Doyle Lonnegan in the movie) out of all his money at the betting window. Could big financial firms (not all) be using this type of delayed reporting to dupe the average investor who mostly trusts financials and P&L statements in order to try and make educated investments?
Comments
4 Comments so far
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
The silo of the big conglomerate is not empty (yet) as evidenced by the conference call. The problem is that the sale of grains that it was going to be used to offset the earnings shortfall coincided with the turmoil at the end of the March.
The big conglomerate, now being called the new Chicago Cubs (shows a lot of promise but can never deliver), says that it will continue to sell grains. The only difference is that analysts are now being steered towards the low end of the lowered guidance. A bit more cushion in case the sale of grains hits another bump in the road.
Thankfully the Dow is price based.
Ge was near 39 on April 1. Then the stock was down six straight days. During that time the worldwide financial numbers were being consolidated once the 3rd quarter ended so somebody knew there would be an earnings miss.
Jack Welch ruined GE. Here’s why…
1) He was obsessed with Six Sigma. Sorry Jack, you don’t grow a company by taking a product which is 99.8% perfect and making it 99.9% perfect. The law of diminishing returns sets in. You should have been developing new stuff, not perfecting old.
2) Time will tell, but when all is said and done, the internet might be the greatest “invention” in history, and GE totally missed it. Imagine that. One of the biggest industrial companies on the plaent has made no money either over the internet or laying the structural foundation of the internet.
Jack you screwed up!!