Jan
23
The Bulls and the Bears, from Craig Mee
January 23, 2008 |
I get the feeling on days like we have seen recently, that it is a total battle between the bulls and the bears, ie who is going to win on the day, with this being signified by being on the positive side of unchanged or the negative side at the close. Coming back from a strong deficit will not be seen as win for the bulls unless they make it over the line- and vice versa. The acceleration of the market into unchanged and away from unchanged throughout the sessions is brutal on the turn.
Vince Fulco ponders:
One wonders what the approximate level of blended Treasury rate is that is low enough to bring out the asset re(allocators). I don't think pension funds can meet long term liabilities with a 3.45% ten year!
Comments
5 Comments so far
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
jeff matthews had a good observation over at his blog: the difference between 2007 and 1987 selloffs is that not one company announced share buybacks during the madness.
Well we WERE going over the falls at 1:30 PM this afternoon, when a convenient ledge suddenly appeared. Not only that, but somehow we magically end up back on shore.
Reminds me of that scene in Monty Python’s “Life of Brian” (there I go again) where the Romans chase Brian to the top of this tall, narrow tower. He loses his balance, falls, and then as he’s plunging to his death, this spaceship full of silly aliens catches him, whisks him into outer space for a bizarre joy-ride, loses control, and crash-lands back to earth just metres away from the original tower. Brian climbs out of the rubble, dusts himself off, and as he’s walking away, a bystander who witnessed the episode call out to him “you lucky bastard”. That was today.
Stocks I think should rally fairly sharply here led by the financials. These have all pretty much finished announcing, which I believe was collectively and carefully orchestrated. They laid out all the major toxic news at once last week with the Fed standing behind the curtain ready with a 75 or maybe even 100 basis point rate cut. Clever really.
With no more financials announcing super-sized writedowns for a while, you’ll get some nuisance “disappointments” from other companies still reporting, but nothing that remotely compares. THAT reminds me of the scene in Austin Powers where Dr. Evil had been frozen in space for 30 years and missed out on a lot. When, in a broadcast to the U.N. he threatens to destroy the world with a ray-gun unless they pay him - “a MILLION dollars!”, they all just look at each other and burst out laughing.
So now when some sorry telecom reports they lost a $billion last quarter, with guidance that all their customers hate them and are about to defect to dial-up, the market’s response will be “A billion dollars; uh-huh; that’s nice. Now just fill out these forms; hand them in when you’re ready; and someone will bet back to you as soon as we have a reaction for you.”
So there’s some breathing room now for the Fed and the bankers to figure out what to do next. And perhaps party time for the rest of us (longs) for a couple of weeks.
“Always look on the bright side of life …”
Cheers
…..and if one were to use the magic formula of Joel Greenblatt, one would find that most of those stocks be it 50 million or 50 billion market cap are near 50% below their 52 week high. So with just a little rise, that 3.5 % can be beat with little risk over a years time, I’d bet…………….dh
There are battles and there are wars.
The battles that I see today are extremely volatile unpredictable and potentially dangerous. One can be winning a battle one day and suddenly the tide turns which ultimately costs one the war. This is to the longs and the shorts.
In poker parlance, It is similar to winning the small pots only to lose the all-in bet and get wiped out.
Perhaps to err on the side of caution now is the key to winning the war.
Seems that the 3 boys who were attacked by the Siberian Tiger in San Francisco were taunting it before the tiger had had enough and it climbed a 20 foot wall and proceeded to exact its revenge on the hapless youths. One killed and two severely wounded.
Sometimes it is best not to agitate wild animals be they lions, bulls or bears.
sl.
Morituri te salutant. I HAVE bet, David.