Aug
14
Why American Horses Run Counter-Clockwise, from Kevin Depew
August 14, 2007 |
Here in the States all horses run counter-clockwise (you can almost feel this answer coming, can't you?) except the ones I wager on, which, due to an optical illusion known among professional gamblers as "being slow," appear actually to run backwards.
But in all seriousness, the clockwise/counter-clockwise question is a very good one. Why should American horse races should be run opposite horse races everywhere else in the world? The horses certainly don't seem to care; European horses frequently ship to the U.S. and perform well despite having no "real race" counter-clockwise experience. And therein lies the answer. As usual when things that don't make sense, politics is to blame.
The first circular racetrack in the U.S. was built by Col. William Whitley near Crab Orchard, KY in Lincoln County, 50 miles south of Lexington in one of the first three original Kentucky counties. Reportedly, the only thing Whitley hated more than the British was losing a horse race. When he built his racetrack, he mandated it be opposite the British style of racing in every way possible. The racing surface was made of clay, not turf, as was customary in British racing. And most important, he reversed the course that the horses run from clockwise to counter-clockwise.
Incidentally, would you believe that Man-O-War in 1920 was the last horse to win the Belmont Stakes in clockwise fashion? From 1867 to 1920 the Belmont Stakes was run clockwise "in keeping with the European tradition." But hey, it's New York. What else would you expect?
Comments
1 Comment so far
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
This is an interesting topic to examine in a broader sense. The helicopter industry, for instance, has generally developed with French and Russian rotors rotating clockwise [viewed from above], while the rest of the world has adopted the opposite direction. http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/helicopters/q0212b.shtml
Which direction have the few inventors of single-bladed rotors chosen?
In the event, it might be enlightening to hear Bo Keely’s comments on where and why we find opposing directions of rotation - in both the human and animal kingdoms.