Dec
14
GM Nigel Davies Improves Himself
December 14, 2006 |
I started reading Dr. Brett Steenbarger’s Enhancing Trader Performance this morning and it’s looking like one of the best guides to self-improvement I’ve ever read and in any field.
Never before have I seen it explicitly stated that one must love the field in which one hopes to succeed and that the process of improvement is driven by this.
Here are two great sentences from page 36 which sum up most of what good chess players have done to acquire mastery: “Explore. Play.”
Bill Rafter relates his rowing experience:
As a former elite-level rower who had gone the “metrics” route, I could reduce success in that sport at the elite level to 2 dimensions. The dimensions could be monitored in real time, and the athlete capable of achieving the best ratio of the two dimensions would win. The problem with the market is that there are N dimensions, with N being a large number, and that number being subject to considerable disagreement among practitioners. Also, “winning” in a boat race or other sport is relatively easily defined. I have been trading for decades, and regularly change my own definition of winning.
Some of the most accepted market metrics are poorly chosen. Sharpe on his own site points out times when the Sharpe Ratio is inappropriate, yet others follow it blindly. My suggestion is that you pick you own “winning” metric, and target that.
“Tis with our judgment as our watches; none run alike, but each believes his own.” -Alexander Pope
But get ready for a lot of testing, as N is a very large number indeed.
Jim Sogi adds:
Dr. Brett writes about recording and studying performance metrics in his book. Though he is dealing with high frequency traders, some good measurement and statistical analysis of trades made, would be very helpful to fine tune and improve the performance of any trader. He claims that this can improve performance and help to avoid blow-ups.
The joke here is that I do not like to watch movies of myself surfing or hear recordings of my music because in my own mind I was making huge dynamic turns on a wave, and sounded like John Lennon on the guitar, but when I see or hear the actual recording, in reality it was just a disappointing knee high wave and the singing is all off key. A legend in my own mind — as Jim Lackey would say, “Get the Joke.”
Sharpe ratios, return, max drawdown, and time to break-even are good basic measures of overall return path, but are there better ways to measure trade by trade statistics? Is there software that will compile or record metrics even on the fly, or from the brokers statements or the trading platform? Do you exit too soon, enter too soon, or leave too much on the table. Is the performance well suited to the current market cycle or are you fighting it? Are you getting killed on breakouts after 3 years of ranges? The stats would need to include not only the trade, but what the market did either before or after, and during your trade, to see how much is left on the table, how much slop there is in your entry, how much wasted commission, how much unnecessary vig. did you pay, time of day issues, seasonal issues, personal issues, were you hold too long, not following systems, was there efficient use of capital?
The top athletes now use scientific study of their performance metrics, and the fine tuning of their mechanics. Baseball players have a detailed set of stats. Any suggestions for a trader to compile his stats on either metrics to consider, or software?
G.M. Nigel Davies sheds further light on the chess world:
In chess the main thing is rating, the numbers don’t lie. If you play well then this is reflected in your rating performance. People often take ‘a view’ on what they did well or badly, but this tends to be corrupted by subjectivity even if they try to be scientific/objective about it. How should one rate trading performance? For short term trading how about calculating the t-score of weekly returns as a percentage of trading capital? A fixed number of weeks would be good with the performance rolling forward over time. Longer term traders might use monthly returns to calculate t-scores. Probably this would be deeply unpopular as people find out how random their trading is. But it has the merits of simplicity, objectivity and zero reliance on anyone’s ‘judgement’.
Jim Sogi raises some open questions and adds a new stat technique to the mix:
Diebold also spoke about distinguishing between alpha with beta. Are you adding value or just adding more risk and just got lucky? As The GM said, the T score of your returns combined with yield vs. the market should sort the beta out. Looking at the stats shows how hard it was to beat the market in the 3rd and 4th quarters where anything less than leveraged buy and hold would have underperformed the 10%, 140 point rise in the S&P.
Performance optimization is a multifactor problem and will vary depending on the Bayes utility factor which ought to be factored in as a risk preference metric. The formula would solve for the highest the amount of change (but not more) needed in various performance factors in order to achieve the greatest increase in the absolute and relative yields relative to the amount of risk preference. It might have similarities to maximum risk formulas with the addition of performance factors.
Comments
WordPress database error: [Table './dailyspeculations_com_@002d_dailywordpress/wp_comments' is marked as crashed and last (automatic?) repair failed]
SELECT * FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = '188' AND comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles