Jun
9
Apologia, from Victor Niederhoffer
June 9, 2007 | Leave a Comment
Sholem Aleichem has a good short story on Yom Kippur. The gist is that all the meanest merchants, worst cheats, and most deceptive partners go to each other’s houses and beg forgiveness for their sins on this day. I feel like I should do the same to our readers, since I've been so busy trading I've been remiss in updating the site.
Battling the market during last week's avalanche was like playing tennis against Laver, checkers against Wiswell or Tinsley, or chess against Capablanca in chess, or baseball against Honus Wagner, who could play all nine positions perfectly. What days, what cyclopean moves! A thirty-five point range, almost the entire range of the year, in one day on Thursday, and a complete recap of the February 27 decline in three days from Wednesday to Friday.
There was total bad faith in the evil self-interest of the big bond fund player who can make money only by manipulating the public into doing the wrong thing, like an undertaker's praying for plague in order to prosper or the Sage's hyping the 100% certainty of another disaster so he can raise insurance rates.
But amidst it all, what a healthy day it was Friday, with bonds up 1.5 points from low, oil down three percent, the dollar up a few percent, and the trend followers all in on the dollar and the bonds. And even some of them, those with any money left, barreling in on the short side of stocks.
What a healthy day for the Popperian refutation of a hypothesis. stocks can’t go up when bonds are down. How bullish this refutation is for the future! And when will someone get up and say that all this hawkish talk about the threat of inflation is bullish for bonds, as it beats down expectations, prevents succumbing to short term solutions, and keeps the lid on any bad policy actions?
Apologies again for all my inadvertent lapses this week. They were legion.
Alan Weissberger remarks:
I think you have the wrong hypothesis: stocks can’t go up when bonds are down. It should be: bonds can't go down if stocks are down big, because there will be a "flight to quality." Of course, this has been true only for the last five or six years. In the 70s, 80s, and early 90s bonds stayed down when stocks went down.
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles